|news | articles | reviews | software | modules | accessories | discussion | faq | mobile | store|
|visorcentral >> articles >> Springboard Modules VS Compact Flash|
Springboard Modules VS Compact Flash
Disclaimer: As a converted former Windows CE user this opinion story might have a somewhat negative tone towards Windows CE.
Microsoft recently released a "Market Bulletin," in which they compare Springboard technology and Compact Flash.
In the bulletin Microsoft takes a shot at Handspring in several categories. First, Microsoft points out that "Applications like reference guides, dictionaries, and remote controls for audio/video equipment are installable in the systemís memory. None of these examples requires the addition of a module Ö Using Springboards as application distribution media is more expensive than floppy disks, according to Handspring. These costs are passed on to consumers, and reduce the revenue received by software developers. "
Am I missing something here? I thought software was installable in the systemís memory of the Visor as well. Oh yeah it is. And PalmOS programs are usually much smaller in file size than a comparable Windows CE program. Springboard technology is just another way for users to add software to their Visor.
Update: Auction Update / VisorAdventure 2
Thu Oct 11 - 12:05 AM EST
InnoGear PowerCradle (updated)
Tue Oct 9 - 10:51 PM EST
iambic Office suite
Thu Oct 4 - 1:12 AM EST
Prism dropped to $299
Tue Oct 2 - 6:19 PM EST
New Portable Keyboard
Tue Oct 2 - 4:46 PM EST